Sunday, July 6,
2014
Over this recent
long weekend I spent some time reading a book I discovered at the home of a
friend near Fergus Falls. The
book, entitled Crisis
in American Institutions,
contains a series of essays that explores various issues in American
society. The essays are grouped by
topic and focus on a variety of issues including the capitalist model, the
specter of inequality, racism, sexism, the family, the environment, the
workplace, healthcare, and criminal justice. I found myself unexpectedly engrossed by many of the
essays. Indeed, they gave me ample
fodder to inspire my writing for the next many weeks.
The essays
invite the reader to contemplate many questions. Just how well is American society functioning today? What institutions are fulfilling their
declared missions? What
institutions are failing and for what reasons? What type of meaningful reform is possible or even realistic
for those institutions teetering on the brink of failure? What are the consequences of our
failure to attend to the deepest of our national issues?
Here are some
instructive words taken directly from the Introduction:
Inflation.
Unemployment. Energy
crises. Decline of the
dollar. Tax revolt. Bankrupt cities. Political corruption and business
bribery as routine news items. …it
is no longer a secret that the American system has not worked the way we were
taught it should. When we first
put this book together in the late sixties, most people who wrote about “social
problems” still thought of the
United States as a society whose basic economic and political problems
had been solved. It is hard to
find anyone who still seriously believes that – even among professional social
scientists. Americans express
continuing dissatisfaction and mistrust about the major institutions that
affect their lives. The important
question is no longer whether American institutions are in crisis, but why –and
what can be done about it.
Theorists are no longer trying to pretend that
there are no real problems; instead, they are seeking the causes in “human
nature” or people’s genetic structure or the “population bomb”. In the face of the deepening crises of
the seventies, many people – both the “experts” and the public – lost fait in
the possibilities of human cooperation, social equality and personal
fulfillment.
Now I ask you to
wager an educated guess regarding when this collection of essays was
published. I deliberately deleted
a time reference included in the introduction I quoted above. I am curious to learn what my dear readers
of my blog might guess. What time
period in American history do you believe is well described by this
introduction? Doesn’t it sound as
if it could describe the last many years in which the United States has endured
‘the Great Recession’?
If you think
these essays are that contemporary you would be wrong; the
most recent copyright year of the book is 1979. Take a moment to allow that to settle upon your mind. I turned six years old in September of
1979. Yes, it’s been a few years
since these essays were written.
And yet they sound as timely as ever. More than three decades have passed and yet the structural
problems described in these essays seem as intransigent as ever.
Unemployment? The issue of employment and lack of
decent opportunities for the American people has been a consistent theme in our
discourse since the economy tanked in 2008. And a person devoted to rigorous analysis must question how
healthy the economy ever was during the two terms of former ‘President’ George
W. Bush. Bush’s foreign policy
helped sustain the already mighty power of the often maligned
‘military-industrial complex’. A
recent news story crowed about how we have finally essentially regained back
the number of jobs we lost during the recession. But of course the real question to ask is what jobs have
replaced the ones we lost? If they
are lower paying jobs with fewer benefits, fewer prospects for advancement
built in and lower skill requirements how can we honestly proudly beat our
chests in honor of our supposed economic recovery?
Energy
Crises? The issue of energy
in the current day is not quite the same as it was in the 1970s. The lack of long-term sustainability of
the energy policies of much of the First World in the present day is, in my
opinion, the true crisis. Despite
the obvious harm now being caused to the Earth’s many systems (biosphere,
atmosphere, hydrosphere, cryosphere) by the continued increase in greenhouse
gases attributable directly to our predominantly fossil fuel powered global
economy current and future economic development continues to plan for power
derived primarily from dirty sources.
This path is simply not sustainable. The costs our society is failing to quantify and internalize
into the necessary analyses performed when long-term energy policy choices are
made do not simply vanish because we do not truly account for them. Someone, somewhere will ultimately pay
the price for our (and by ‘our’ I mean to refer to the most developed, wealthy
countries in the world) current energy policies. The critique offered by the global South regarding the
consequences their populations will face due to the energy choices of the
global North is, in my opinion, a thoughtful, compelling and timely one. I read such critiques while attending
graduate school. I also read some
of them in my ‘off time’.
In short,
Americans, Chinese and the peoples of Western Europe consume a vast portion of
the world’s global energy output and yet the waste byproducts of such energy
production will inordinately harm, via the growing phenomenon of climate
change, the peoples in the world’s poorest and most vulnerable nations. People driving countless fuel
inefficient SUVs are helping to drive up the water level in low-lying
Bangladesh. Life has never been
fair but it seems to be as unfair as it ever was.
Bankrupt
Cities? Detroit is the first
present day example that comes to mind.
And Detroit is not alone.
Many cities are facing unbearable costs due to a variety of factors
whose complex interaction defies simple policy responses. The primary factors today are an aging
demographic (with all the implications for different spheres of living this
implies), climate change and fundamental transformations in the nature of our
national economy.
Political
corruption and bribery? One
only need conduct a cursory review of current and recent news stories to
understand this issue is alive and well.
Names that have become (or are rapidly becoming) synonymous with
corruption include Chris Christie of New Jersey and Scott Walker of Wisconsin. And then of course there is John Boehner’s
recent declaration of his intent to possibly attempt to sue President
Obama. Never mind that Boehner is
a typical whiny Republican determined only to serve the interests of his own
party even at the expense of the rest of America.
Even where
corruption itself is minimal there abound many examples of ample political and
financial power being used on issues that possess only minor significance in
our nation’s daily life. One
example is the ongoing hysteria regarding gay marriage that a shrinking portion
of those on the political Right continues to stir up. As the gay marriage bans in states throughout the nation
continue to be deemed unconstitutional time and time again it appears fairly
clear that this ‘issue’ will eventually (in a few decades?) become a non-issue.
Outside the
realm of social policy there are plenty of examples of political problems. Gun violence is a good example. Another is the veritable impotence of
our current Congress to get anything substantive done in any timely way. Public approval of Congress has been at
all-time record lows for some time now.
And yet the American people’s vehement disapproval of Congress’s
performance seems to do nothing to change our current course. The depth of Congress’s insulation from
the most pressing needs of many Americans is truly appalling. And many Americans feel powerless to
reform the system. Indeed, what
can one person do? As if on cue I found an excellent article today that examines the dysfunction of the American political system.
It sometimes seems (to me at least) that the entire structure of our society will have to utterly and completely collapse before something new and much more functional could potentially take its place. Will this happen? I believe it will at some point. But when? And how much damage will occur in the meantime? Will our system ultimately produce a whole collection of people who, by being born ‘at the wrong time’, will find their professional lives and prospects permanently scarred by the depth of the ‘Great Recession’? Will we eventually have our own lost generation like what happened in Japan in the 1990s? Speaking from my own perspective I wonder just how easily I will be able to escape the ravages of the Great Recession.
It sometimes seems (to me at least) that the entire structure of our society will have to utterly and completely collapse before something new and much more functional could potentially take its place. Will this happen? I believe it will at some point. But when? And how much damage will occur in the meantime? Will our system ultimately produce a whole collection of people who, by being born ‘at the wrong time’, will find their professional lives and prospects permanently scarred by the depth of the ‘Great Recession’? Will we eventually have our own lost generation like what happened in Japan in the 1990s? Speaking from my own perspective I wonder just how easily I will be able to escape the ravages of the Great Recession.
To summarize, it
appears life in America isn’t much better than it was in 1979. By major metrics such as wage growth,
job security, healthcare affordability and the like it seems life in America
isn’t all that exciting and rewarding.
There have been some changes…but are they good changes? We have experienced incredible advances
in technology which have created notable improvements in the fields of
medicine, weather forecasting, commerce and communications. We now have mobile devices that can
assist us in connecting to anyone, anywhere at any time. And yet some people look at their
mobile phones as they walk into the street and then get struck by cars. Technology is no catch all
panacea. Technology solves some
problems. And then it creates new
ones. For excellent critiques
regarding the wonders and horrors of technology explore the writings of Jerry
Mander.
Since 1979 we
have experienced the explosive destruction of the unexpected AIDS epidemic, the
self-absorption of the 1980s in which greed was exalted as an inherently good
individual and collective quality and the surprising collapse of the Soviet
Union.
The 1990s seemed
to be a better decade. Germany was
reunified in 1990. The former
Communist countries of Eastern Europe embarked on a new course that tantalized
its peoples with the appeal of greater prosperity and enhanced personal freedom
as compared to what they had known during their time behind the Iron
Curtain. Here in America greed was
exalted as a quality to cultivate in your personal and professional
relations…or at least so it appeared.
I was coming into adulthood in the 1990s and, like many young men, I was
still discovering who I was in a world increasingly defined by incredibly rapid
change.
Then came the
2000s. Despite how clichéd it may
now sound to many the events of September 11, 2001 radically changed the global
geopolitical environment. Despite
the fact that many (both domestically and abroad) challenged the United States
government to respond to the events of that day in a way that did not primarily
emphasize the use of the military the United States nonetheless later did
invade Afghanistan.
Our nation’s emphasis
on ‘might making right’ as a primary response to terrorism seems to now be
creating many undesirable consequences.
On the top of the list of undesirable results is the population of
veterans returning from Afghanistan and Iraq who deeply need an extensive array
of services to reintegrate into society.
Veterans themselves are not undesirables; I have spoken in support of
the needs of veterans previously in my blog as well as elsewhere. But sick, broken people do not make for
a vibrant healthy populace and strong economy. Sick people may be a boon to the healthcare economy in the
short term but long term disability, unemployment and illness ultimately exert
significant drag on a society. Who
wants to be sick?
In my opinion
the last approximate decade of time has very much mirrored the 1970s. I was born in the 1970s and, given the
early life trauma I experienced, I have few memories of that time. I can nonetheless make an educated
comparison of our present time to the 1970s using informed opinions such as the
essays I read through this weekend.
As a result of
what has and has not happened these last ten years I have been left wondering
just what exactly are reasonable expectations to hold…about most
everything. As America has become
a deeply polarized nation according to criteria such as wealth, access to
opportunity and political positions on varied issues I have felt a growing
concern that the unsustainable aspects of this nation will interact
synergistically in the not too distant future to unleash a degree of
instability that will cause widespread chaos and suffering. Yes, this grim concern may be at least
somewhat unfounded and overly pessimistic but I wonder nonetheless.
……
Over the coming
weeks I plan to continue writing my ongoing documentary of my recovery process
and simultaneously intersperse my writings with some reflections inspired by
the essays I read during this weekend.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I invite you to accompany me as I document my own journey of healing. My blog is designed to offer inspiration and solace to others. If you find it of value I welcome you to share it with others. Aloha!